Chery Automobile holds 5 sub-brand, Rely, Chery, Kerry, Riich and XuanYuan brand new (not released).
- Chery: Product-line includes A3, A1, A5, V5, Tiggo, Cowin, QQ3, QQ6, QQme.
- Depends: Depends is a brand held by Chery Sub Group, the philosophy of the brand, according to the official explanation, is the "Machine & Drivers". Product-line includes a series of SUVs, MPVs and minivans.
- Karry: Derived from the English word "Resume", the product-line includes a series of minivans and pickups
- Riich: Its product line includes a series-high and the cars the middle class.
- XuanYuan: new brand aimed at "Super luxury" segment. Appropriate date to launch a new brand that has not been released
Selasa, 05 Januari 2010
Senin, 04 Januari 2010
Chery car history
Chery is known to copy foreign designs, including General Motors' Korean subsidiary GM Daewoo Auto & Technology Daewoo Matiz (sold as Chery QQ) city car and Daewoo Magnus (sold as Chery Eastar) mid-size sedans, along with embelm emerged from the Infiniti embelm.
Chery trying to negotiate a local Chinese production licenses of vehicles by Daewoo Motors went bankrupt before General Motors' purchase of the assets of the bankrupt car in 2002, but negotiations never closed. However, Chery continue with the production of this former Daewoo vehicle without a license, triggering General Motors to sue Chery for copying in December 2004, citing "extreme similarities".
General Motors has not been able to press the case against Chery in Chinese courts, despite pressure from the Chinese government. In November 2005, GM chose to drop the case to defend other interests in China and maintain good will with the government.
However, the GM reserves the right to sue Chery again if he tried to bring the vehicle into the European and North American markets. Vehicles affected by the three Matiz clone and derivatives (QQ3, QQ6 and A1) and Magnus clone and derivatives (Eastar, V4, B12, and B22).
IP rights issue has become such a concern that DCX is said to have contacted GM for possible licensing of GM Daewoo vehicle IP on Chery's name after signing a 25-year partnership and exclusive distribution agreement with Chery in early 2007.
Chery trying to negotiate a local Chinese production licenses of vehicles by Daewoo Motors went bankrupt before General Motors' purchase of the assets of the bankrupt car in 2002, but negotiations never closed. However, Chery continue with the production of this former Daewoo vehicle without a license, triggering General Motors to sue Chery for copying in December 2004, citing "extreme similarities".
General Motors has not been able to press the case against Chery in Chinese courts, despite pressure from the Chinese government. In November 2005, GM chose to drop the case to defend other interests in China and maintain good will with the government.
However, the GM reserves the right to sue Chery again if he tried to bring the vehicle into the European and North American markets. Vehicles affected by the three Matiz clone and derivatives (QQ3, QQ6 and A1) and Magnus clone and derivatives (Eastar, V4, B12, and B22).
IP rights issue has become such a concern that DCX is said to have contacted GM for possible licensing of GM Daewoo vehicle IP on Chery's name after signing a 25-year partnership and exclusive distribution agreement with Chery in early 2007.
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)